By the time a customer has damaged cash flow, staff morale and the owner’s confidence, the decision is still possible, but it is harder. The owner may act, but the business pays for the delay. Once again, the problem was not invisible.
The signs were there in the unpaid invoices, the discounted margins, the interrupted workflow and the sigh from the staff member who had to take the call. The opportunity to act existed long before the crisis. The owner was not lacking information.
There was a business owner I once dealt with who had a customer he referred to as his “biggest account” with the same sort of pride other people reserve for a first grandchild, a premiership win or finally getting a good park outside Bunnings on a Saturday morning. Every time we discussed the business, the name of that customer appeared early in the conversation, usually accompanied by some variation of, “They’re keeping us busy,” as if busyness was the same thing as progress.
On paper, the customer looked impressive. They placed large orders, they created regular work and they gave the business owner the comforting feeling that he had finally cracked the next level. When the customer first arrived, everyone treated the account like a breakthrough, because that is what it appeared to be from the outside.
The problem was that the customer never simply ordered something and paid for it. They wanted different terms, special pricing, urgent delivery, extended credit, customised work, constant reporting and immediate attention whenever something went slightly wrong. They also had a remarkable ability to make their problems feel like emergencies that everyone else was expected to solve.
At first, the business owner accepted all of this as the cost of winning a major customer. That is what people often do when they are trying to grow. They tell themselves that big customers come with big expectations, and they convince themselves that the discomfort is simply part of becoming a more serious business.
The staff knew earlier than he did. The person answering the phone knew, because she could feel her stomach tighten whenever that customer’s number appeared. The people doing the work knew, because every ordinary job seemed to get interrupted by another urgent request. The bookkeeper knew, because the invoices were always paid late and always required chasing.
The owner knew as well, although he would not have admitted it at the time. He could explain away almost everything, because the monthly sales figure gave him something to point at. The turnover had grown, the bank manager was more interested than before and the business looked more substantial than it had twelve months earlier.
What nobody wanted to discuss was whether the customer was actually worth having. That question sat in the corner of every meeting like a dog that knew it was not supposed to be on the lounge. Everyone could see it, but nobody wanted to be the first person to point.
By the time we properly examined the numbers, the answer was obvious. The customer was generating revenue, but it was not generating worthwhile profit. Worse than that, it was consuming cash, staff time, management attention and goodwill at a rate no normal sales report would ever reveal.
The customer had become a trophy account, and trophy accounts can be dangerous. They make the business owner feel bigger while quietly making the business weaker. They look good in conversation, but they can do terrible damage in the bank account.
When the owner finally admitted the problem, it was not because of some sophisticated financial analysis. It was because he was tired. He was tired of the phone calls, tired of the pressure, tired of the excuses, tired of watching good staff become short-tempered and tired of wondering why a customer producing so much turnover was making the business feel poorer rather than stronger.
That is often how the truth arrives in business. It does not arrive as a spreadsheet with a neat heading and a perfect conclusion. It arrives as exhaustion, frustration and the quiet realisation that something which was supposed to be helping has become one of the reasons you no longer enjoy walking through your own front door.
The hardest customer to fire is rarely the small difficult one. The small difficult customer is easy to resent, because their contribution is usually too modest to disguise their behaviour. The hard one to fire is the customer who looks important, talks loudly, spends heavily and makes the owner afraid of what the business might look like without them.
That fear is understandable. No business owner enjoys the thought of deliberately reducing revenue, especially when wages, rent, suppliers, finance repayments and tax obligations continue to arrive with religious consistency. It feels almost irresponsible to turn away work when so many people are telling you that growth is the measure of success.
Yet one of the lessons I learned over many years is that not every dollar of revenue is equal. Some dollars arrive cleanly, with a reasonable margin, a fair relationship and a payment made on time. Other dollars arrive covered in mud, dragging behind them discounts, delays, disputes, overtime, stress and staff resentment.
The profit and loss statement does not always show the difference clearly. It records sales, purchases, wages and expenses, but it does not always capture the emotional cost of a bad customer. It does not show the family dinner interrupted by an unreasonable demand, the staff member who leaves because they are sick of being abused, or the good customer who receives worse service because the difficult customer has consumed all available attention.
This is why the customer you should fire is rarely identified by the sales column alone. They are identified by the pattern they create around them. They may be profitable in a narrow sense, but if the whole business bends around their demands, the true cost may be much higher than the numbers first suggest.
In some businesses, the customer you should fire is the one who never pays on time. They are always apologetic, always waiting for money from someone else and always promising that payment will arrive next Thursday. The strange thing is that next Thursday seems to have a habit of moving forward one week at a time.
In other businesses, the customer you should fire is the one who pays, but only after making everyone miserable. They challenge every invoice, question every charge, complain about every delay and treat normal commercial boundaries as personal insults. They are not necessarily dishonest, but they have learned that pressure often produces discounts.
There are also customers who should be fired because they want a business to become something it should never become. A builder becomes trapped doing low-margin maintenance work because a large client keeps feeding them just enough jobs to stay interested. A professional practice becomes buried in low-fee compliance work for clients who ring constantly and value nothing. A retailer discounts so heavily for one group of customers that loyal full-price customers quietly become less important.
The issue is not always the customer’s character. Sometimes the customer is perfectly decent, but the fit is wrong. A good customer for one business may be a terrible customer for another, because the service expectations, price sensitivity, payment terms or operational demands do not match the way the business can profitably operate.
This distinction matters, because firing a customer does not need to be emotional. It does not need to be angry, theatrical or personal. In many cases, firing a customer simply means changing terms, raising prices, enforcing boundaries or choosing not to accept the next piece of work.
There is a difference between being grateful for customers and being held hostage by them. Every business needs customers, but not every customer deserves the same level of access to the business. The danger begins when the owner becomes so afraid of losing a customer that the customer effectively starts managing the business.
I saw that happen many times. A customer would demand faster delivery, and the business would reorganise its week. A customer would demand extended credit, and the business would quietly become their bank. A customer would demand a discount, and the owner would accept a lower margin rather than risk the relationship.
Each individual concession looked harmless enough at the time. That is how most business problems develop. They do not usually arrive wearing a sign around their neck saying, “This decision will damage your business in eighteen months.”
The concessions accumulated quietly. A small discount became standard pricing. A temporary extension of credit became permanent trading terms. A one-off urgent job became the expectation that everyone else could be pushed aside whenever that customer clicked their fingers.
By the time the owner finally noticed, the customer had been trained. This is one of the uncomfortable truths of business. Customers often behave in the way the business has taught them to behave.
If a business teaches customers that invoices can be paid late without consequence, some customers will pay late. If a business teaches customers that complaints produce discounts, some customers will complain. If a business teaches customers that boundaries are flexible whenever enough pressure is applied, some customers will apply pressure.
This does not mean customers are villains. It simply means people respond to incentives, and business relationships are no different from any other human relationship in that respect. Behaviour that is rewarded tends to be repeated.
The difficult part is that many business owners create these patterns with good intentions. They want to help, they want to be flexible and they want to be known as someone who goes the extra mile. Those instincts are not bad, because they are often the same instincts that built the business in the first place.
The problem begins when generosity becomes the operating model. A favour is one thing, but a business built on favours eventually discovers that favours do not pay wages. You can be helpful, decent and commercially sensible at the same time, although many owners behave as if they must choose between kindness and survival.
One of the most revealing exercises in any business is to look at customers not by revenue, but by contribution. That does not require turning the place into a university assignment. It simply requires asking whether the work produces a fair return after considering the time, margin, payment behaviour and disruption attached to it.
A customer who spends fifty thousand dollars and quietly produces ten thousand dollars of profit may be more valuable than a customer who spends two hundred thousand dollars and leaves almost nothing behind. The first customer may not impress anyone at a barbecue, but they may be helping keep the business healthy. The second customer may sound wonderful in conversation, but they may be chewing through capacity that could have been used much better elsewhere.
In the real world, this is rarely obvious at first glance. Most small business owners are too close to the noise of the day to see the pattern clearly. They feel the pressure of the work, they know the customer’s name and they remember the big invoice, but they do not always connect that invoice to the labour, discounts, debtors, rework and stress sitting behind it.
This is where numbers become useful, not as cold accounting records, but as a way of telling the truth when emotion has become too persuasive. The numbers may reveal that a customer always requires overtime. They may show that invoices are consistently paid sixty days late. They may show that gross margin falls every time that customer’s work increases.
Once the numbers confirm what the staff have already been saying, the conversation changes. It stops being a matter of whether the owner likes the customer or fears losing them. It becomes a question of whether the relationship is helping the business become stronger.
That question should be asked earlier than most owners ask it. Too many wait until the customer has already damaged cash flow, drained morale or crowded out better opportunities. By then the business is no longer choosing calmly, because it is reacting under pressure.
The “20 Days Too Late” moment in these situations usually comes when the owner finally decides to act, but discovers the damage has already spread. The overdraft has grown, the staff are worn down, better customers have drifted away and the business has become dependent on the very customer it should have challenged months earlier. The decision to act may still be correct, but the cost of delay has become much higher than it needed to be.
In the case of the owner with the trophy account, he eventually changed the terms. He increased the price, shortened the payment period and made it clear that urgent work would carry an urgent price. It was a reasonable commercial conversation, although it felt to him like he was walking into a gunfight armed with a teaspoon.
The customer reacted exactly as he feared. They complained, suggested they could take their work elsewhere and reminded him how much business they had given him. They behaved as if the business owed them gratitude forever, regardless of whether the arrangement still made sense.
What happened next surprised him. Some of the work did go elsewhere, but not all of it. The work that remained became better priced, better managed and less disruptive. The business lost turnover, yet cash flow improved.
That result should not have been surprising, but it often is. Business owners are trained by experience to fear the loss of revenue, because revenue is visible and immediate. The improvement that comes from removing bad work is quieter, because it appears as fewer interruptions, better margins, less overtime and invoices that do not require a monthly search party.
The staff noticed first. They had more room to do the work properly, and they stopped feeling as if one customer controlled the whole place. The owner noticed later, when he realised that he was no longer starting each day by bracing himself for that customer’s next demand.
The business did not collapse. It breathed. That is often what happens when a bad customer is finally dealt with, because the business has been carrying a weight it had slowly come to regard as normal.
The fear of firing a customer is usually greater than the reality. That does not mean every business can casually lose major accounts without consequence. It means the decision should be examined honestly before fear is allowed to make the decision on the owner’s behalf.
Sometimes the answer is not to fire the customer immediately. Sometimes the answer is to repair the relationship by resetting expectations. A late-paying customer may become acceptable if they move to payment on delivery. A demanding customer may become worthwhile if the price reflects the urgency and complexity they require.
Other times, the relationship has gone too far. The customer has been trained for too long, the resentment has become too deep and the business has lost too much ground. In those cases, the cleanest decision may be to stop pretending that the relationship can be made healthy.
There is no bravery in keeping a bad customer because you are too frightened to imagine the business without them. There is also no wisdom in firing customers recklessly simply because they are difficult. The point is not to become arrogant, but to become discerning.
Good businesses are not built by saying yes to everything. They are built by understanding what kind of work should be accepted, what kind of customer should be pursued and what kind of relationship should be allowed to continue. The best owners usually learn that growth is not merely more, because sometimes growth means better.
That lesson can be hard for Australian small business owners, particularly those who have built their businesses through personal relationships. In a country town, firing a customer can feel like starting a feud. In a family business, refusing work can feel like offending someone who knows your cousin, your football club and possibly what you were like in Year Ten.
Even in the suburbs, the same pressure exists in a different form. A tradie may keep working for a builder who pays late because the builder keeps promising more volume. A café may keep supplying a local organisation at a discount because the owner likes being seen as supportive. A professional adviser may keep servicing a client who argues about every bill because the relationship goes back twenty years.
Loyalty is a good thing, but loyalty without fairness becomes a trap. A long relationship should not be used as a reason to ignore current reality. The fact that a customer was once important does not mean they remain good for the business forever.
Businesses change, and customers change with them. A customer who suited the early years may no longer suit the business when its costs, staff, risk and capacity have changed. The owner who cannot admit that may remain emotionally loyal to a relationship the business has financially outgrown.
This is where sentiment becomes expensive. Many owners can identify bad customers quickly when discussing someone else’s business, but they become strangely creative when explaining their own. They will say the customer has been there from the beginning, or that the customer might become profitable later, or that the customer refers others, even when those referred customers are just as painful.
I have heard every version of that explanation. Some were true, but many were simply a way of avoiding a hard conversation. The owner was not really defending the customer. They were defending their reluctance to act.
Avoidance has a cost, although it rarely appears as a single invoice. It appears as a series of small leaks. A few extra hours here, a bit of unpaid rework there, a discount to keep the peace, an overdue account carried for another month and another good employee wondering why management tolerates poor behaviour.
The hardest leak to measure is opportunity cost. When a business is full of bad work, it has less capacity for good work. That is not theory, because anyone who has run a business understands the brutal reality that time used one way cannot also be used another way.
A workshop filled with low-margin jobs may have no room for higher-margin work when it appears. A professional practice buried under needy low-fee clients may not have the energy to pursue better advisory work. A manufacturer chasing volume for a difficult customer may miss the chance to build a more diverse and profitable customer base.
This is why “we are busy” can be one of the most misleading phrases in business. Busy can mean strong demand, healthy margins and a business operating well. It can also mean poor pricing, bad customer selection and an owner running faster each month while wondering why there is less money left over.
The customer you should fire is often hiding inside that busyness. They are easy to miss because their activity creates the feeling of progress. Everyone is moving, phones are ringing, invoices are being raised and the business looks alive.
Yet activity is not the same as achievement. A business can be busy and broke at the same time, which is one of the crueler lessons of commercial life. The owner who does not understand that may spend years celebrating turnover while cash quietly disappears.
There is a simple way to begin seeing the truth. Look at the customers who create the most stress and ask whether they also create enough return to justify it. That question is not perfect, but it is a good starting point because stress in business usually has a source.
Then look at payment behaviour. Customers who consistently use your business as an interest-free lender are not merely late payers. They are transferring their cash flow problem to you, and they will keep doing it for as long as you let them.
Then look at price resistance. Some customers are expensive because they consume time before the work even begins. They want quotes redone, terms changed, inclusions expanded and discounts applied, yet they still behave as if they are doing the business a favour by accepting the job.
Then look at staff impact. If your best people become tense, cynical or unavailable whenever a particular customer appears, pay attention. Staff often recognise customer problems before owners do because they experience the behaviour without the emotional comfort of seeing the revenue figure.
Finally, look at whether the customer fits the business you are trying to build. This is the question owners often avoid because it forces them to define what they actually want. A customer may provide work, but if that work drags the business away from its better future, it may be the wrong work.
None of this requires a complicated system. It requires honesty, and honesty is sometimes harder to find than software. Many business owners would rather buy a new program than sit quietly with a question they already know the answer to.
The danger with bad customers is that they normalise poor business behaviour. They make the owner accept thin margins, late payment and constant pressure as part of the game. After a while, the owner forgets that a different kind of business is possible.
I have seen owners become almost apologetic about wanting to be paid on time. That has always puzzled me, although I understand how it happens. Somewhere along the way, they absorbed the idea that asking for payment was awkward, while the customer withholding payment was merely part of business.
There is nothing unreasonable about wanting fair payment for fair work. There is nothing greedy about pricing properly. There is nothing disloyal about refusing to let another business use your cash, your people and your patience without proper respect.
A business owner who cannot say no will eventually find that the market says no for them. The bank may say no when the overdraft grows. Staff may say no by leaving. Suppliers may say no by tightening terms, and good customers may say no by quietly taking their business somewhere less chaotic.
That is the part many owners miss. Keeping a bad customer is not always a neutral decision. It can damage relationships with good customers, because capacity is finite and attention is limited.
The good customer who pays on time, treats staff decently and accepts fair pricing may not shout for attention. They may not ring every second day, threaten to leave or demand special treatment. Their silence can make them easy to take for granted.
Bad customers often get more attention because they create more noise. Good customers often receive less attention because they create fewer problems. That is a dangerous reward system, because it teaches everyone that the customer who behaves worst receives the greatest service.
A healthy business reverses that pattern. It protects its good customers, because those relationships are the foundation of long-term profit. It does not allow the loudest customer to become the most powerful customer.
Firing a customer may therefore be an act of loyalty to the rest of the business. It can be loyalty to staff who deserve not to be mistreated. It can be loyalty to good customers who deserve reliable service, and it can be loyalty to the owner’s family who deserve not to inherit every commercial compromise at the dinner table.
The phrase “fire a customer” sounds harsher than it needs to be. Most of the time, it is not a dramatic dismissal. It is a decision to change the rules of the relationship and let the customer decide whether they still want to play.
That might mean requiring deposits before work begins. It might mean removing discounts that no longer make sense. It might mean charging properly for urgent work, custom work or work that disrupts normal operations.
It might also mean saying that the business is no longer the right fit. There is a calmness in that phrase that many owners underestimate. Not every customer needs to be wrong for the relationship to end, because sometimes the fit is simply no longer there.
The best time to have these conversations is before resentment takes over. Once resentment becomes the main emotion, owners either avoid the conversation entirely or conduct it badly. They let months of frustration come out in ten minutes, and then wonder why the customer reacts defensively.
Earlier action allows better conversations. A customer who is thirty days late can be spoken to more calmly than one who is ninety days late and still ordering. A customer who is stretching expectations can be reset before the business has completely reorganised itself around their demands.
That is the lesson that keeps appearing in different forms throughout business. The problem is rarely that no option existed. The problem is that the option became harder because the owner waited too long.
Twenty days earlier, the discussion might have been simple. Twenty weeks earlier, the relationship might have been repaired. Twenty months earlier, the business might have built a broader customer base and avoided dependence altogether.
By the time the owner finally acts, the decision often feels much larger than it needed to feel. That is not because the decision itself changed. It is because the consequences of not making it have gathered around it like storm clouds.
This is why customer concentration is another issue worth watching. A difficult customer is bad enough, but a difficult customer who represents a large percentage of revenue is far more dangerous. The customer does not need to intend harm, because the dependence itself creates risk.
When one customer becomes too large, the business owner begins making decisions to protect that customer rather than to protect the business. Prices are softened, payment terms are stretched and staff are directed around the customer’s expectations. The customer may never ask for control, but control slowly transfers anyway.
A business with one dominant customer can feel successful while becoming fragile. The owner may look at the revenue and feel secure, but security based on one relationship is not always security. It can be dependence wearing a better suit.
The answer is not to reject large customers automatically. Large customers can be excellent when the pricing, terms and relationship are healthy. The answer is to ensure that size does not blind the owner to risk.
In farming, retail, trades and professional practices, the same principle applies in different clothing. A farmer dependent on one buyer, a retailer dependent on one product line, a subcontractor dependent on one builder and an adviser dependent on one large client all understand the same vulnerability. The details differ, but the pattern is familiar.
A good business owner does not panic about that pattern. They simply pay attention to it. They ask what would happen if the customer disappeared, slowed payment, demanded lower prices or changed direction.
Those questions are not pessimistic. They are protective. There is a difference between worrying about everything and refusing to be surprised by the obvious.
The customer you should fire may be obvious to everyone else. Your staff may know, your spouse may know and your accountant may know. The only person still negotiating with reality may be you.
That is not a criticism, because every owner has blind spots. Some cannot see bad staff, some cannot see poor pricing and some cannot see that a customer they proudly won years ago has become a burden. The danger is not having a blind spot, because everyone has one.
The danger is refusing to let anyone point it out. A business owner who punishes honesty eventually receives less of it. Then they become surrounded by people who can see the problem but have learned not to say so.
If a staff member tells you a customer is damaging the business, listen carefully. They may not have the full financial picture, but they probably have the daily experience. Their frustration may be the early warning system your management reports have failed to provide.
If the bookkeeper tells you the customer is always late, listen carefully. Debtors are not just numbers on a page. They are promises made by customers and financed by the business until those promises are honoured.
If your family tells you that one customer seems to dominate your mood, listen carefully. They may not understand the technicalities of your business, but they understand the version of you that arrives home. Sometimes the people outside the business can see the cost more clearly than the people inside it.
The mistake is to wait until the evidence is overwhelming. By then, it is rarely evidence anymore. It is wreckage.
Every business should occasionally conduct a quiet review of its customer base. Not a grand strategic retreat with coloured markers and expensive sandwiches, but an honest conversation around who the business serves best and who the business should stop serving. The owner should know which customers produce profit, which produce stress and which produce both.
Some customers deserve patience because they are fair, loyal and temporarily under pressure. Business is human, and rigid rules can be as damaging as no rules at all. A good customer having a bad month is not the same as a bad customer repeating the same behaviour for years.
That distinction is important. The point of this chapter is not to encourage business owners to become cold or transactional. It is to remind them that generosity should be intentional rather than accidental.
If you decide to support a good customer through a difficult patch, do it with open eyes and clear limits. Know what you are doing, why you are doing it and when the arrangement will be reviewed. That is very different from drifting into unpaid banking services because you are too uncomfortable to ask for what is owed.
Business owners often think the hard part is attracting customers. In the early years, that may be true. The phone does not ring enough, the pipeline is thin and every enquiry feels precious.
As the business matures, the harder skill is choosing customers. That is a different discipline, and it requires a different confidence. It requires the owner to understand that not every opportunity is an opportunity worth taking.
The businesses that survive over long periods usually develop standards. They know their ideal customer, their proper margin, their acceptable payment terms and the behaviours they will not tolerate. They may still make exceptions, but they know they are making exceptions.
Weak businesses often have no standards beyond the hope that someone will say yes. They accept work because it appears, not because it fits. They confuse movement with direction and revenue with success.
That is how the wrong customers slowly shape the business. They shape pricing, culture, cash flow and confidence. They teach the owner to accept less while demanding more.
The customer you should fire is not merely a customer problem. It is a leadership problem, because the owner must decide what the business is allowed to become. That decision cannot be outsourced to the market, the staff or the customer.
It is uncomfortable to accept that, because it removes a convenient excuse. If a customer keeps behaving badly and the business keeps accepting it, the issue is no longer only the customer’s behaviour. It is the business’s permission.
There is freedom in accepting that truth. Once the owner recognises that permission has been granted, permission can also be withdrawn. Terms can be changed, boundaries can be set and unsuitable relationships can be ended.
That may reduce revenue in the short term. It may create an awkward conversation, and it may bruise the owner’s pride if the customer walks away. Those are real considerations, but they are not reasons to ignore the problem forever.
The real question is whether the business is better with the customer or merely bigger because of them. Bigger is not always better. Sometimes bigger is just heavier.
The owner with the trophy account eventually learned that lesson. He had been measuring the customer by the sales they produced, but the business had been experiencing the customer by the damage they caused. Once he understood the difference, the decision became much clearer.
He later admitted that he should have acted earlier. That admission was not dramatic, and there was no great speech attached to it. It was simply the weary honesty of a business owner who could see, with the benefit of hindsight, that the warning signs had been there for a long time.
Most of the important business lessons sound obvious after the event. Of course the customer was paying late. Of course the margin was too thin. Of course the staff were frustrated, and of course the owner should not have let one account dominate the business.
That is why hindsight can feel so cruel. It gives clarity after the moment for easy action has passed. The purpose of paying attention is to bring some of that clarity forward before the cost becomes too high.
The customer you should fire is not always the one shouting the loudest. Sometimes it is the one quietly dragging the business away from its best use of time. Sometimes it is the one who seems harmless because they have always been there.
Sometimes it is the customer the owner still talks about with pride. That is the most dangerous version, because pride can hide problems for years. A customer who once represented success can later become the reason the business stops progressing.
Business owners should not be ashamed of outgrowing customers. Growth changes what a business can afford to tolerate. The work that helped establish the business may not be the work that sustains it later.
That is true of customers, products, services and habits. The early years of business often reward flexibility, improvisation and saying yes. The later years require discipline, selectiveness and the willingness to say no before the business is damaged by its own helpfulness.
Saying no is not a failure of service. It is part of building a business that can keep serving well. A business that says yes to the wrong people too often eventually becomes less capable of saying yes to the right people.
There is a quiet dignity in choosing better customers. It is not arrogance, and it is not forgetting where the business came from. It is recognising that a business has limited capacity and that capacity should be used where it creates value.
The best customers understand this. They do not want their suppliers, advisers or contractors to be underpriced, exhausted and resentful. Healthy commercial relationships work because both sides can continue with respect.
That is ultimately what this chapter is about. It is not about punishing difficult customers or becoming hard-hearted. It is about building relationships that make commercial sense and having the courage to end or change the ones that do not.
By the time a customer has damaged cash flow, staff morale and the owner’s confidence, the decision is still possible, but it is harder. The owner may act, but the business pays for the delay. Once again, the problem was not invisible.
The signs were there in the unpaid invoices, the discounted margins, the interrupted workflow and the sigh from the staff member who had to take the call. The opportunity to act existed long before the crisis. The owner was not lacking information.
He was lacking willingness.
That is a pattern we will keep meeting. Business problems rarely remain neatly inside one category. A bad customer becomes a cash flow problem, then a pricing problem, then a staff problem, then a culture problem.
Once staff are involved, the issue becomes even more personal. Customers can sometimes be moved on with a change of terms or a difficult conversation. Employees are different, because they sit inside the business every day and shape the way it feels from the inside out.
That is where the next uncomfortable question waits. If the customer you should fire can damage a business from the outside, what happens when the problem is already inside the front door, wearing the company shirt and collecting wages every Thursday?
Author
